***Big upset, Los Angeles Unified School District race for East San Fernando Valley seat....
* Los Angeles Times: "Monica Ratliff's election to L.A. school board is 'huge upset'" - "The fifth-grade teacher's low-budget effort defeats Antonio Sanchez, who had $2.2 million spent on his behalf and was endorsed by the mayor's reform coalition." - From the LAT:
On its face, the election this week of a Los Angeles fifth-grade teacher to the Board of Education was a stunner. Monica Ratliff's low-budget effort included her boyfriend, a film school instructor, as her campaign manager. She had no paid staff and no meaningful help from her own politically active teachers union. Her strategy to achieve some name recognition was to mail out refrigerator magnets, which cost $5,000 in scarce campaign funds. Ten to 20 faithful volunteers knocked on doors every weekend.
Her election night party? She jammed some 10 people into her one-bedroom apartment and then shooed them out at 11 p.m. — before the results were in — because she had to get up early to teach on Wednesday.
Her opponent, Antonio Sanchez, meanwhile, had more than $2.2 million spent on his behalf and an aggressive ground campaign of union volunteers and paid canvassers. He was endorsed by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's Coalition for School Reform, which received major donations from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and L.A. philanthropist Eli Broad, among others.
Political observers shook their heads Wednesday as they tried to make sense of it all..................
* Daily News: "Veteran teacher Monica Ratliff scores upset win in lopsided race for LAUSD board" - From the DN:
Attorney-turned-teacher Monica Ratliff was elected to represent the East San Fernando Valley on the LAUSD board, upsetting a heavily favored rival with strong political ties and seemingly unlimited campaign resources. According to unofficial results from Tuesday's runoff, Ratliff received 20,243 votes compared with 18,779 for self-described education advocate Antonio Sanchez, who finished well ahead of her in the March primary.
Sanchez, 31, had the endorsement of powerful labor unions and financial support from well-funded political action campaigns, while Ratliff ran a part-time campaign on a shoestring budget. That had been seen as a disadvantage heading into the runoff, but on Wednesday it was viewed as a key to her success.
"At the end of the day, the teacher running against the establishment and outside money was the main thing driving her victory," said Raphael Sonenshein, the executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at Cal State Los Angeles. "Sometimes, getting all of the support is worse than getting some of the support."
****
Ratliff received no help from political action committees but raised $37,000 in contributions for the runoff. She spent about $40,000 on her campaign, which works out to about $1.98 a vote. With direct and independent expenditures, Sanchez spent $47.16 per vote..............